Maybe we can build all the nuclear power plants on military bases like fort Knox. So that if terrorist come they cant do anything to the nuclear power plants.
I agree with Hunter in saying that keeping nuclear plants on military bases is probably a safe bet. We do however have to consider that no matter where we keep them, if we can can to them, it is also possible for other countries.
I think Hunter has a good idea, but i think that it is just giving terrorist permission to attack our military base's and that would not be a good idea especially when we have nuclear energy that can possibly explode.
i disagree with hunter and say that security in america is good enough although mistakes will happen and can't be avoided all the time... no matter how much precautions you take
I agree with Hunter, if we build our plants on military bases they will be under 24 hour security, and be protected by a whole city of the military. It would probably be the safest place to put the plants.
If we build nuclear power plants in areas like deserts and tundras, we won't have to worry about terrorist attacks. Terrorists won't attack them if there aren't any civilians around in the area. The only problem is having to transport the nuclear energy. Nuclear weapons should be kept at military bases where they'd be under watch all the time.
I agree with Dustin. No matter how good our security is, there is always a chance that something bad could happen. Whether it's our fault or a terrorist's fault. Also, terrorist's would probably want to attack military bases.
Maybe we can build all the nuclear power plants on military bases like fort Knox. So that if terrorist come they cant do anything to the nuclear power plants.
ReplyDeletewell maybe we could build some sort of machine that tracts the terrorist and when they come it would be hiden is a military base.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Hunter in saying that keeping nuclear plants on military bases is probably a safe bet. We do however have to consider that no matter where we keep them, if we can can to them, it is also possible for other countries.
ReplyDeletewell going back to what hunter said i think if we operate power plants near our bases we can keep an eye out for anyone trying to attack them.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Hunter, the more protected the nuclear power plant is the less people would want to attack it.
ReplyDeleteI think Hunter has a good idea, but i think that it is just giving terrorist permission to attack our military base's and that would not be a good idea especially when we have nuclear energy that can possibly explode.
ReplyDeletei agree with hunter, and we can keep all the nuclear power plants further away from my house because i dont want to die
ReplyDeletei agree with hunter we will be way more protected if it was on a military base
ReplyDeletewe all die due to attacks
ReplyDeletei disagree with hunter and say that security in america is good enough although mistakes will happen and can't be avoided all the time... no matter how much precautions you take
ReplyDeleteI agree with Dustin he has a valid point that not all problems can be stoped.we cant always stop disasters from happening.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Hunter, if we build our plants on military bases they will be under 24 hour security, and be protected by a whole city of the military. It would probably be the safest place to put the plants.
ReplyDeleteIf we build nuclear power plants in areas like deserts and tundras, we won't have to worry about terrorist attacks. Terrorists won't attack them if there aren't any civilians around in the area. The only problem is having to transport the nuclear energy. Nuclear weapons should be kept at military bases where they'd be under watch all the time.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Dustin. No matter how good our security is, there is always a chance that something bad could happen. Whether it's our fault or a terrorist's fault. Also, terrorist's would probably want to attack military bases.
ReplyDelete